Category Archives: Employee Benefits Distribution

It’s Time to Simplify Benefits


Since I have been in the benefits business, either as a distributor or as a technology advisor, benefits communication has always been a problem and a topic of discussion. Brokers and employers have been developing fancy benefit booklets or creating detailed benefits statements all in an effort to get employees to understand and appreciate their benefits. Now with the advent of the web, brokers and employers have built websites and developed videos to give employees access to benefits information 24/7 often only to take them down a year or two later because nobody is using them. Trust me, I have seen hundreds of utilization reports and very few people are using these sites. Yet, after all this effort the majority of employees still don’t understand their benefits. I say enough already! Why don’t we try to make things easier? Well I have some suggestions.

Let’s start with the health insurance business. When I got in the business in 1986 many plans were still straight deductibles and coinsurance. In fact, one of the most popular products was the Guardian Insurance $100 deductible 100% plan. While I realize this type of plan was not sustainable financially, I will say it was simple. Concurrently there was the growth of HMO, PPO, and POS plans. Along with that came all kinds of copays and new rules on whom you had to see first before you saw someone else. Now there are HSA’s and HRA’s sold with high deductible plans. I think it’s funny that they call high deductible plans, Consumer Driven. Wouldn’t it have been easier if we just took a straight $100 deductible 80/20 to $5000 plan from 1986 and adjusted the deductible and coinsurance every year for inflation?

Today health insurance is very confusing and it’s going to get worse. I think my prescription drug card today has like 8 different copays. Recently I had treatment for a health condition and between my primary care physician, the specialist, the hospital, and the lab, I have so many bills I had to bring them all to the office and try to figure them out. Each bill had about 6 different figures on them. Between what they were billing, the discounts, copays, deductibles and coinsurance I could not figure things out. It’s been two weeks and the bills are still on my desk. There is no way the average American is going to figure this out. I have such a headache from this I need to see a doctor.

While I do realize the logic for creating these monster plans, it simply hasn’t worked. The health insurance business is becoming like the tax code. Everyone is manipulating the system to modify behavior. If you want people to buy more cars then you give a “Cash for Clunkers” tax credit. You want people to buy more houses you lower interest rates and give people an interest deduction. You want people to stop using Emergency Rooms you give them a $100 ER deductible. And that gets me to my prescription copays – I simply punt on that one. When I go the Pharmacy I just say “tell me what I owe you”, and I assume the pharmacy is telling me the truth. I have no idea whether the drug is name brand, generic, generic plus, or whatever new category has been created. Enough already!

Personally I think this whole country could operate on about 10 easy to understand health insurance options. As an employer and employee would I care? No. I don’t need all those options. I would bet that I could develop 10 plans that would be within 3% actuarially of every plan in America today. What I believe is that other than all the little nuances in health care plans (that nobody understands) the majority of plans in effect today are almost exactly alike. Imagine how easy it would be for employees, doctors, hospitals, etc… to understand and administer such plans. This would not eliminate competition. It would make Aetna’s Plan 1 the same as Blue Cross and United Plan 1. I would go to the doctor and say I have Plan 1 with Aetna and everyone would understand. To make things even easier I would go back to straight deductible and coinsurance plans. Obviously this is not going to happen with ObamaCare. Just think of what a $100 deductible 80/20 to $5000 plan from 1986 would look like if you adjusted the deductibles and copays for inflation.

I could go on and on with other insurance coverages. Your Spouse can buy Voluntary Life equal to 50% of the employee amount but the employee can get no more than 3 times earnings to a maximum of $150,000 when combined with the Base Life paid for by the employer. And if the employee is 65 and is subject to a reduction schedule it needs to be multiplied by 65% assuming his birthday is closer to the last renewal date than the next one. What?

If you are a benefits broker or insurance company the idea of making things easier may be considered blasphemy. I can hear all the arguments already. But one really has to honestly ask, does anyone really care about all these plan differences? Personally I don’t think so.

Are Your Differences Unique or Relevant


While coming back on a plane from a West Coast trip I was reading an article in the Harvard Business Review whose main premise was “how to create a unique and repeatable business model” to more effectively compete in today’s business environment.  The article made three main points that I thought applied directly to the benefits business. The points were:

“Differentiation is the essence of strategy, the prime source of competitive advantage.”

“Are your differences measurable against your competitors?”

“Are your differences relevant to your competitors?”

For the past 10 years or so one of the ways brokers have been trying to differentiate themselves was through technology. In the early 2000’s it was giving away benefit websites. In fact, the vendors themselves all sold the idea of “being different” and bringing more value added services to get business. Their sale pitch was, “If you don’t do this the broker down the street will and you will lose.” For a short time this did make a difference for some though it really wasn’t’ sustainable. Websites eventually stopped becoming a differentiator when everyone could do it. And I would argue there was not huge demand so there was more sizzle than steak.

While we can acknowledge that having a unique value proposition is a competitive advantage it only is so if it passes the test of numbers 2 or 3 above. This reminds me of the time I was speaking at a broker conference in Atlanta and I asked the room, “How are you different?” A broker on the left raised his hand and said, “I provide great service”. One on the right raised his hand and said he too provided great service. My question to them was how this is measurable to a prospect. Great service is an expectation, not a differentiator in most industries.

The third point above probably is the one I talk about the most with brokers. “Are your differences relevant?” Is what you bring to the market significant enough or in enough demand by the buyer to help you stand out from the crowd. You can be different but if nobody is demanding what you have then it is not relevant.

I was speaking with a broker in Florida late last year when one of the brokers asked me, “Do you have compliance newsletters?” I replied by asking if he wanted compliance newsletters or did he want to be different. He said he wanted to have a unique value proposition for his clients. Somewhere along the way he drew the conclusion that compliance newsletters would make him different. I would contend that compliance newsletters aren’t very relevant to the buyer. Getting access to information on the web is too easy. While an employer may appreciate a newsletter they don’t make buying decisions because of them.

Many of the vendors pitching their products to brokers are telling brokers, “use my technology and you will be different”. Most of their products aren’t relevant differentiators and many are easily duplicated. In fact, for many of these vendors you are the actual customer, not the client, because they want you to pay for it with your commissions.

Creating and maintaining a unique value proposition that will make a real difference to the end customer takes a lot of thought and work. Many firms go in search of vendors with products. I think you need to go offsite for a few days with your team and do an honest assessment of what the market is demanding and stop buying into the broad promises made by the vendors.  Ask yourself the questions above. Are your differences measurable and are they relevant?